Mind in Life by Evan Thompson The Embodied Mind by Francisco J. Varela Phenomenology of Tree of Knowledge by Humberto R. Maturana Zen and the Brain by James H. Austin da mecânica quântica e de uma teoria social do conhecimento de sabor marxista. . “Sabendo como sabemos” é o tema deste livro. São Paulo: Difusão Européia do Livro. Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. G. (). A Árvore do Conhecimento, tradução de Humberto Mariotti e Lia Diskin. Fazer um resumo esquemático do livro base, para cada aula e que deve ser .. Comentários ao livro ´a árvore do conhecimento – Maturana e Varela. Publique.
|Country:||Sao Tome and Principe|
|Published (Last):||25 December 2013|
|PDF File Size:||7.69 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.22 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Fale com a Editora!
The story I tell myself about my life has heroes and villains, goals and challenges, grand themes and petty foibles. The result will be a history of mutual congruent changes as long as the autopoietic unity and its containing environment do not disintegrate: Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
However, if the others also put objectivity in parenthesesyou discover that disagreements can only be solved by entering a domain of co-inspiration, in which things are done together because the participants want to do them. This is a prime example of obesity in literature, a book that says much but nothing at all.
Organisms must exhibit variance of the time scale of their environment and in a complementary “direction” in order to adapt remain coupled.
It compels us to see that the world will be different only if we live differently. If you’re buying this book you’re looking for different knowledge. The theory is built from scratch to explain the natural emergence of these phenomena in biological systems, and it leads us to beautifully conclusion that the mind is shared, it emerges in social contexts and love is the guiding force of the phenomenon. Unities may couple via inclusion think organelles or recurrent coupling with the maintenance of individual identities individual humans.
I think the big concept is autopoiesis, which is that in living things there is an internal unity and divider between the living thing and the environment. In the end we happen, with our consciousness and we are obliged to bring it forth in a way that allows others to share it. To phrase it differently, the space of possible reactions to an environment is defined in the internal structure of an organism; the environment does not inject behavioral commands into an organism in any way.
O não-sentido na Cognição Enativa | Kroeff | Revista Polis e Psique
The author explicitly states at the beginning of the book that he intends to reform the totality of the scientific method, and not only that, the totality of knowledge as well, by establishing a new all-encompassing conceptual framework I loved it!
Ob Peter Druckers “Communication is what the listener does” auch ihre Wurzeln hier hat? We began with the features of our experience common to our shared social life.
Mar 03, Nick rated it it was amazing Shelves: I came to this book years ago through, of all things, a two-year course in business and sales, for which it was required reading along with “Computers and Cognition”, another eye-opener; the latter anticipated the current transactional nature of the Internet. Another big idea here is the idea that adaptation is a conserved feature of living things.
An interesting book as it presupposes almost no knowledge and tries to explain a theory of cognition rooted in biology. Make a label conhecimentoo your bookshelf: All in all, a book that’s almost quite completely entirely unlike a something that is superficially similar to a masterpiece. This book is most likely going to totally change your perspective on what it means to know. It can never be solved in the domain where it takes place if the disputants are ‘certain.
The two biologists go well beyond their original disciplines, delving into philosophy, spirituality and psychology, as examples of overlapping domains in this such essential but overlooked perhaps due to its complexity concept of cognition. I know that may seem like a petty complaint, given the nature of the book, but this is major leagues conceit we are talking about.
The more we understand the soaring, rich, complex stories those around us are telling themselves, the more we can overcome misunderstandings, conflicts and cultural dissonance – the more, in a sense, we can construct a meta-story that serves us all as human beings. Here you have the most important mistakes one can make – there are smaller ones! Different observers and even the same observer at different times with different goals will have different domains of arrvore and will define a unity in a different way.
A conflict is always a mutual negation. But my definition pales. I maturwna an example: A unity entity, object is brought forth by an act of distinction.
Does nervous system limit predictions? We indicate this process when we call that organization that defines them an autopoietic organization. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.
Disciplina Complexidade, Conhecimento e Sociedades em Rede
Apr 28, Joe Raimondo rated it it was amazing. This book came out of a series of lectures given by conhscimento writers as a contribution fm a decision in by the Organization of Anerican States to research the many difficulties confronted in social communication and knowledge transfer. Because there is the root of the conflict. Sep 05, Marijn Meijles rated it really liked it.
The rest does have some nice insights but consists mostly of rather dry material sprinkled with some examples. But please, do read this. So, buy the book and become a different person.